NettetLEON JOSEPH First Applicant VALERIE MOSES Second Applicant VICTOR MOKETE MOKOENA Third Applicant LUCRICIA VAN WYK Fourth Applicant SHANICE MAYEZA … NettetMazibuko v City of Johannesburg 2010 (3) BCLR 239 (CC). Facts People were not paying for water so the government wanted to implement a prepaid water system. This would’ve provided the basic standard amount of water (6 kilolitres) Infrastructure was already weak in Phiri.

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

Nettet10. des. 2024 · In 2009 the Constitutional Court – in the case of Joseph and Others v City of Johannesburg and Others – considered the question of whether individuals have a right to receive electricity after the tenants of a block of flats in Johannesburg (Ennerdale Mansions) approached the court to challenge the decision by City Power to … http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAFSHC/2024/264.pdf palace\\u0027s tc

Joseph AND Others v CITY OF Johannesburg AND Others 2010 (4 …

Nettet9. jun. 2024 · In some countries administrative justice is dependent on its development via common law by the courts, while in others is possible to have recourse to a constitutional provision permitting persons whose right is infringed by … Nettet9. okt. 2009 · Joseph and Others v City of Johannesburg and Others (CCT 43/09) [2009] ZACC 30. On Friday 9 October 2009, the Constitutional Court delivered judgment in an … NettetSee (Joseph and Others v City Of Johannesburg An Others 2010 (4) SA 55 (CC). [14] The applicant submits that although the respondent is not a municipality, it is a service provider tasked by the Mangaung Metro Municipality to fulfil its statutory obligation of supplying electricity to its population. palace\u0027s tg