NettetThe State’s brief is silent regarding defendant’s allegations and makes no claim of forfeiture. We think the di fferences between defendant’s claims areworthy of a brief discussion. ¶ 22. Pro se. postconviction petitions “must be given a liberal construction and are to be viewed with a lenient eye, allowing borderline cases to proceed.

Hodges v. Carter* - CASE BRIEF WORKSHEET Title of Case:...

NettetFacts - name of the case and its parties, what happened factually and the judgement Kathleen Carter was a senior citizen living in North Vancouver who was diagnosed with … NettetHODGES v. CARTER Supreme Court of N.C., 1954 Plaintiff’s Name: H ODGES Defendant’s Name: C ARTER Appellant’s Name: H ODGES Appellee’s Name: C ARTER Citation: 80 S.E.2 D 144 Key Facts: (Who are the parties, what is the dispute about, who is suing whom for what, what are the facts relevant to the (stated) issue or issues, etc.)-P … fresh foam kaymin trail

Hodges v. Carter Case Brief Summary Law Case Explained

NettetHodges v. Carter case brief summary F: TC dismissed, P (client): The D failed to adhere to a standard of care to act as a reasonably and prudent person, exercising the degree of learning, skill, and ability of an attorney. NettetCivil Case No. 1:13-cv-00501 (Honorable Timothy S. Black) AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY VALUES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS … Nettetobjection from any party. No party or party’s counsel authored this brief in whole or in part or financially supported this brief, and no one other than amicus curiae, its members, or its counsel contributed money intended to fund preparing or submitting this brief. Case: 14-3057 Document: 34 Filed: 04/17/2014 Page: 10 fresh foam hupoo