WebBut states have varied from the general rule. Chattels annexed without permission: General rule that in absence of agreement, a person who annexes chattel to owner’s land has no right to recover it (Brand v Chris Building Society Pty Ltd [1957] VR 625). Plaintiff wants an injunction and defendant wants cost . WebBrand v Chris Building Co Pty Ltd [1957] VR 625; [1957] VicRp 91, applied Discount & Finance Ltd v GehULJ¶V16::LQHV/WG(1940) 40 SR (NSW) 598, cited New South Wales Trotting Club Ltd v Glebe Municipal Council (1937) 37 SR (NSW) 288, cited Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365; [1969] HCA 3, cited Portland Downs Pastoral Co Pty Ltd v Great …
Portland Downs Pastoral Company Pty Ltd v Great Northern …
http://nailahrobinson.com/EquitableRemedies/Maxims.htm WebMar 5, 2003 · Equity & Trusts03 History of Equity - Part I 1 Since 14th century - equity petitions were various but the source of grievance was common common law: inflexible, rule bound, rigid & resistant to arguments based on considerations of … forward festival line up
VR Judgment
WebBrand v Chris Building 1957 VR 625 A house built by mistake on a block of land from LAWS 216 at Macquarie University WebDec 17, 2024 · In Elitestone Ltd v Morris [1997] 1 WLR 687, the court found that a house that cannot be removed from the land without destroying it, cannot have been intended as a chattel but must have been intended to form part of the land. Palumberi v Palumberi (1986) NSW ConvR 55-287. This case considered the issue of fixtures and whether or not items … WebBrand v. Chris Building Co Pty Ltd [1957] VR 625; [1958] ALR 160, per Hudson J (following . Fry J in Willmot v. Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96; [1881-5] All ER Rep Ext 1779) Elements: the party must be mistaken as to his rights (e.g., as to the ownership of the land); that party must spend money or do some act on the faith of the mistaken belief; forward ffo